The default procurement position of Australian governments is to use an open tender process to stimulate market competition. This process is suited to most procurement decisions.
Governments also like to encourage the best ideas and solutions, along with a greater level of private sector investment in projects. To this end, governments have frameworks for partnering with the private sector and not-for-profits on innovative and unique projects.
Under the National Private Public Partnership Guidelines each Australian State and Territory jurisdiction is permitted to have a bespoke policy for dealing with market-let proposals (‘unsolicited proposals’) and for granting exclusive mandates.
These policies specify a series of tests governments use to determine whether a proposal is suitable to an unsolicited proposal process, or perhaps a traditional tender process.
Initiative Capital uses these same tests when judging if a proposal is an acceptable investment. These tests ensure unique benefits are provided to governments and citizens.
Part time security jobs in cincinnati TESTS APPLIED TO NEW PROPOSALS
|binaire opties strategieen Non-Compete||The proposal should not compete with any existing proposal (or similar approach) being considered by the government.|
|http://www.macfixer.co.uk/?veselowivem=%D9%81%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%83%D8%B3-%D8%A7%D9%84%D9%85%D8%B5%D8%B7%D9%81%D9%89&d02=83 Need||The proposal should address a clear community need and a clear government priority.|
|go to site Government Priorities||The project should align with the government’s priorities by creating additional economic activity including jobs and training, while assisting the government’s strategic priorities for development. Consideration should also be given to how the new asset or service will be used for community needs.|
|http://i-betel.org/?paltysw=opzioni-digitali-non-funziona&86b=fd Uniqueness||The proposal should be something that cannot be delivered by traditional operators. A unique blend of funding, IP, ownership, research, community and local outcomes must be demonstrated.|
|source link Value for Money||It should be demonstrated that a cost to government will be removed in the future. The project should also offer limited (or no) risk to government.|
|http://tilteed.com/?encefalitos=iforex-online-trading-que-es&439=0e Capacity and Capability||Finally, the proponent should demonstrate financial capacity and a track record for delivering such a project.|
go BENEFITS TO GOVERNMENT:
If a proposal passes the tests listed above, it will offer three layers of capital public benefit.
The project will:
Provide services at a cost rate lower than government services
Deliver an asset of value, and dividends, to the community and government, and
Offset future capital budget requirements for government (i.e. delaying required government capital expenditure or ‘capex’).